PopeSpaceous / Solitary

A 2D Puzzle Platformer built with Unity
Other
6 stars 10 forks source link

Choose a suitable license for the project. #107

Closed PopeSpaceous closed 5 years ago

PopeSpaceous commented 6 years ago

The wishes of the original developers are to use this project as a learning tool or for personal use. We do not want the game to be sold in any state.

lejara commented 6 years ago

The gnu license v3 might fit the bill here https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0

I do have to fully read it though

lejara commented 5 years ago

We need to get this stored before others contribute code/ assets

PopeSpaceous commented 5 years ago

So from my research, there are no licences that strictly prohibit the software from commercial use, that generally conflicts with the clause about no discrimination of people using the software. So the licence we should probably use is the GNU GPLv3 licence. This maintains the licence through all versions and iterations. If someone were to try to sell this, the GNU GPL licence would still be attached saying it is an open source software.

Before applying the licence, I'm going to look into how it reacts with the sound and sample clips.

I did find that there is this licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. This is not a true open source licence though. Let me know your thoughts.

Dragomegak commented 5 years ago

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-free-for-non-commercial-use-license-to-use-for-an-open-source-project This seems to be an article that I think would be applicable to this case. Maybe have 2 licenses like the article says "So that some people (in your case, non-commercial use) get it under an open source license, and other people (commercial establishments) pay for it. ". Can't say I know of any licenses that would fit the project otherwise. Just my two cents.

PopeSpaceous commented 5 years ago

Yeah I remember reading that article, but thanks for linking it for others too @Dragomegak

PopeSpaceous commented 5 years ago

This issue has been resolved in PR #148