PostHog / meta

This is a place to discuss non-product issues in public.
MIT License
18 stars 4 forks source link

Messaging: Refund comms for duplication incident #128

Closed joethreepwood closed 1 year ago

joethreepwood commented 1 year ago

Messaging

We charged approximately 85 customers more than we should as a result of a duplication incident. No users were charged more than $36. We've fixed the issue, done a refund, and are running a comm to tell them via email.

Cohort of impacted users.

Draft below.

Screenshot 2023-08-29 at 19 21 28
joethreepwood commented 1 year ago

All set up and ready to go with an approval from @raquelmsmith - I'll allow some time for others to feed in if they wish before scheduling.

We could consider a more corporate tone, but better to keep this simple given the low stakes IMHO.

raquelmsmith commented 1 year ago

No users were charged more than $36.

We actually can't be confident about this because of what I mentioned in Slack, the printed amounts were not correct. So while no customers were refunded very much, I think we can just say something like "most users were overcharged by $35 or less" to give us a bit of wiggle room.

We've credited your account because we got something wrong

This sounds a bit... severe? Formal? Ambiguous? Something? Maybe something like "Whoops! We charged you for duplicate events, so we've credited your account."

Content:

Prob start off with "we have good news and bad news." Just starting with "the bad news" feels like something to contextualize is missing, and I'm wondering if there is good news or if it's all bad news. Or just remove words about "bad" and say "hey, we accidentally duplicated events and charged you for them, so we're making it right."

It was really a 2-day period but you can say 5 if you want?

Their bank balance won't be back to normal because we credited their account, we did not refund them. That means their bill next month will be less the amount that they were overcharged.

joethreepwood commented 1 year ago

Yeah, fresh eyes in the morning lead me to agree. Here's a V2:

Screenshot 2023-08-30 at 10 43 17

I'll schedule this now for Thursday 16:00 UTC, so let me know before then if further feedback!

raquelmsmith commented 1 year ago

2 day period

I prefer this with a hyphen - 2-day period

Most users were charged an extra $35

Nope, most users were overcharged less than $35. Most were overcharged by $1-5.

refunded you for the extra amount bank balance should now be back to normal

We did not refund, we credited their account. "We've added a credit to account, so you'll pay less on your next bill."

joethreepwood commented 1 year ago
Screenshot 2023-08-30 at 17 58 23

I clearly did not have my coffee this morning. Should have caught 2 of those at least. Sorry, but all fixed now.

raquelmsmith commented 1 year ago

Looks great! Thanks @joethreepwood!