Closed P-EB closed 3 months ago
Sure, this should be possible
I had a look, and only threadname seems to conflict, everything else already GPL-2+, GPL-3 or a compatible license.
<3
@neilcook Thanks!
Do you have plans on a release I could use for Debian? :)
@neilcook Thanks!
Do you have plans on a release I could use for Debian? :)
That's a good question. Unless I get a bug reported, requiring a patch release, I tend to create feature releases fairly infrequently, (between 6-12 months) which is probably a bit long. I'd rather not create a release specifically for this, so I'll have a think about a compromise.
@neilcook Could you release something like a patch release (ie 2.10.1.1), potentially just having the license fix over 2.10.1 ? Alternatively I can wait a couple months.
Well it would be 2.10.2 not 2.10.1.1. If you can wait a bit that would be great.
Ack
2.10.2 released
JFYI
Didn't reply but saw the release, thanks! <3
Describe the bug Hi,
Some of your code is licensed under GPL-3, other parts (eg `threadname) is under GPL-2 (not GPL-2+).
According to GNU, this is not possible.
Could you relicense any GPL-2 code under "GPL Version 2 or later" ?
This would allow me to package weakforced into Debian.
Thanks !