Closed SSvilen closed 4 years ago
Hi @PlagueHO,
would you have the time to review this one? It's a relatively small change.
Hi @SSvilen - can you fix the conflicts on this one and I'll get it through. Sorry about the recent delays.
Also, @SSvilen we're moving AnalyzerRules to its own modules, so please submit a similar PR for dsccommunity/DscResource.AnalyzerRules before this can be merged.
Thanks, and sorry for the overhead.
Merging #350 into dev will decrease coverage by
<1%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #350 +/- ##
===================================
- Coverage 84% 84% -1%
===================================
Files 12 12
Lines 1750 1767 +17
Branches 2 2
===================================
+ Hits 1477 1491 +14
- Misses 271 274 +3
Partials 2 2
Reflecting the comment from the DscResource.AnalyzerRules
, you're missing unit tests for New-SuggestedCorrection
function.
Hi @gaelcolas, @SSvilen - where are we at with this one? Is it still waiting changes?
Hi @PlagueHO - this is already implemented in DscResource.AnalyzerRules and I think it does not make sense to merge it here also. (as this module will be retired). I'm closing this one.
Pull Request (PR) description
I have added correction for the keyword checks (capital letters and missing single space between keyword and parenthesis). May be this would help someone in the future. Let me know what you think.
This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
None.
Task list
This change is