Port Style Upgrades in DscResources Folder from xPSDesiredStateConfiguration

[mhendric]

Pull Request (PR) description

Ports most of the style upgrades from xPSDesiredStateConfiguration that have been made in files in the DscResources folder. Among other things, this will help to ensure that the two modules are as in sync as possible, which will in turn help with porting changes and features between modules.

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

None

Task list

• [x] Added an entry under the Unreleased section of the change log in the README.md. Entry should say what was changed, and how that affects users (if applicable).
• [ ] Resource documentation added/updated in README.md.
• [ ] Resource parameter descriptions added/updated in README.md, schema.mof and comment-based help.
• [ ] Comment-based help added/updated.
• [ ] Localization strings added/updated in all localization files as appropriate.
• [ ] Examples appropriately added/updated.
• [x] Unit tests added/updated. See DSC Resource Testing Guidelines.
• [ ] Integration tests added/updated (where possible). See DSC Resource Testing Guidelines.
• [x] New/changed code adheres to DSC Resource Style Guidelines and Best Practices.

---

This change is 

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #162 into dev will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 80%.

@@         Coverage Diff         @@
##            dev   #162   +/-   ##
===================================
  Coverage    83%    83%           
===================================
  Files        19     19           
  Lines      2760   2760           
  Branches      4      4           
===================================
  Hits       2303   2303           
  Misses      453    453           
  Partials      4      4

[mhendric]

Reaching out to the community for help reviewing this one. Would someone be able to help with this?Tagging frequent helpers for awareness: @PlagueHO , @johlju , @tmeckel, and @X-Guardian

[PlagueHO]

I'm on it! Haven't had much time lately.

[mhendric]

Hey @PlagueHO and @johlju , it's a little late, but I just realized that the above decision pretty much kills #140 that @mgreenegit had submitted. I wonder if we should just move his suggested examples to the comment based help. Thoughts?