search

PresConsUIUC / PSAP

Home of the Preservation Self-Assessment Program application.
https://psap.library.illinois.edu/
Other
4 stars 1 forks source link

Irrelevant question display in Score Summary #316

Closed rnedge closed 8 years ago

rnedge commented 9 years ago

Re follow-up assessment questions not posed to the user (due to how they answered the primary question): could we gray these out or remove these from the Score Summary screen?

screen shot 2015-07-02 at 3 24 40 pm

jamieviva commented 9 years ago

@rnedge @adolski I also noticed that the bound book assessment had a question with wording that referred to "image": screen shot 2015-07-02 at 1 59 02 pm

jhain commented 9 years ago

That would be

“Are there additional copies, facsimiles, and/or access copies of this image?” (question 2 in the assessment)

I also wonder if we should add a response in that same section of “no container needed” for “Does this item have an appropriate enclosure in good condition?” that would score the same as “yes”. Many books don’t NEED containers. Thoughts?

From: Jamie [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 3:57 PM To: PresConsUIUC/PSAP Subject: Re: [PSAP] Irrelevant question display in Score Summary (#316)

@rnedgehttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_rnedge&d=AwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=VmdTHodLILmRa-mKuNJG6pXvAPSt1Xuzf4ocbYKHlTE&m=c8UK_5XhvsrmczzfLCHNearH3yeMgQuNKVdADD_s33c&s=EJeJIlWP7jHEQFCUScOuQOS0WPtmPucwX9XaOkEnM-o&e= @adolskihttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_adolski&d=AwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=VmdTHodLILmRa-mKuNJG6pXvAPSt1Xuzf4ocbYKHlTE&m=c8UK_5XhvsrmczzfLCHNearH3yeMgQuNKVdADD_s33c&s=VbVen0QVuQpCRG8ACi4iuZNAFXshmF7IZ7atyyg5mTM&e= I also noticed that the bound book assessment had a question with wording that referred to "image"

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_PresConsUIUC_PSAP_issues_316-23issuecomment-2D118166358&d=AwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=VmdTHodLILmRa-mKuNJG6pXvAPSt1Xuzf4ocbYKHlTE&m=c8UK_5XhvsrmczzfLCHNearH3yeMgQuNKVdADD_s33c&s=pgN2cWL9GceWojvxlzzWRNX34OBip37BX49ZpyZn-No&e=.

jamieviva commented 9 years ago

I had the same thought when I was testing out a bound book collection -- but would all our users necessarily be able to evaluate whether a book needs a container or not?

jhain commented 9 years ago

I think that’s at least better than forcing them to say “no” when it doesn’t need one and docking them points when the lack of container is irrelevant.

j

From: Jamie [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:10 PM To: PresConsUIUC/PSAP Cc: Teper, Jennifer Hain Subject: Re: [PSAP] Irrelevant question display in Score Summary (#316)

I had the same thought when I was testing out a bound book collection -- but would all our users necessarily be able to evaluate whether a book needs a container or not?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_PresConsUIUC_PSAP_issues_316-23issuecomment-2D118169469&d=AwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=VmdTHodLILmRa-mKuNJG6pXvAPSt1Xuzf4ocbYKHlTE&m=eKZafO-4-n0URujD40c8K5jZDABJ-HAkQZZbJ9BAagE&s=SRmEj20GQ27OR8e4DA1Tsqw7M5bbi7mrv7hX8FkVdUk&e=.

adolski commented 8 years ago

Original issue fixed by hiding questions with no responses. The bound book thing continues in #329.