Closed mbkumar closed 2 years ago
Hi Bharat,
looks good :+1:
Could you please make this fix be based on the pywrap_makefile
branch instead of master
?
The issues Antoine was facing in #160 are fixed on the pywrap_makefile
for compilation using a Makefile, and thus we need the other changes made there as well.
I propose to merge the pywrap_makefile
as soon as the fix from this PR is integrated.
Best, Jonathan
Done. You can merge pywrap_makefile into the master instead of mbk/f90wrap_rename. I'll withdraw the PR.
Bharat Medasani
Engineer Princeton Plasma Physics Lab (PPPL)
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:08 AM Jonathan Schilling @.***> wrote:
Hi Bharat,
looks good 👍 Could you please make this fix be based on the pywrap_makefile branch instead of master? The issues Antoine was facing in #160 https://github.com/PrincetonUniversity/SPEC/issues/160 are fixed on the pywrap_makefile for compilation using a Makefile, and thus we need the other changes made there as well.
I propose to merge the pywrap_makefile as soon as the fix from this PR is integrated.
Best, Jonathan
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PrincetonUniversity/SPEC/pull/161#issuecomment-1041268410, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA62VEGLXX53A5T2SSXEJO3U3NSQ3ANCNFSM5ONOZ2SA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Withdrawing this in favor of merging pywrap_makefile
branch. The changes are merged into the pywrap_makefile
branch.
To prevent confusion with multiple files with the same name, f90wrapper generated module is renamed to spec_f90wrapped. Changes are made only to Cmake framework. Makefile is not touched.