PrincetonUniversity / princeton-mvpa-toolbox

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/princeton-mvpa-toolbox
GNU General Public License v3.0
64 stars 56 forks source link

'tutorial_runs.mat' appears to be corrupt #2

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. load('tutorial_runs');
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
It is expected that the file would load, but instead I get

??? Error using ==> load
Unable to read MAT-file C:\Users\Jay 
\Documents\MATLAB\working_set\tutorial_runs.mat

File may be corrupt.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Matlab R2010b.  Windows 7 (64bit)

Please provide any additional information below.
I tried re-extracting the file from nifti_set and afni_set and these replaced 
files still don't work.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Jay.Jesc...@gmail.com on 18 Apr 2011 at 1:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Jay,
Unfortunately MVPA is not supported in Windows (of any flavor) at this time.  
You should find these files should work fine under a Matlab Linux installation. 
 If not please let me know.
-Garrett

Original comment by gmcgrath...@gmail.com on 9 May 2011 at 8:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Jay,
As an update to this I have now tested our downloads in the local Linux 
environment (which I had done previously) and a generic Windows 64-bit 
environment (running 2010a).  The .mat files worked fine in all instances.  I 
unpacked them both using Linux's 'tar -zxvf' command and in Windows using 
'peazip' (I've also tested the Linux unpacked files in Windows).  This said, 
there are a few deficit areas to support in Windows at present.  Specifically 
we depend on the Linux package AFNI to provide some of the functionality of the 
MVPA package.  There are also a number of C-Code files that we provide binary 
builds of, these do not have a native windows version provided in the toolbox.  
They may infact work fine but haven't been tested at this time.

-Garrett

Original comment by gmcgrath...@gmail.com on 10 May 2011 at 9:08