Feat(next.js): Migration to next.js

[AugustinMauroy]

Introduce Next.js

Sadly, it's not really the same in style. but in content it's same.

After merge of this pr I will improve the project.

don't worry!

Implement next.js help to maintain the website

feature added

• Typescript support
• Twitter link
• Discord link
• Icon for link
• Dark mode
• Linter
• Code format
• 404 page
• Sass support

feature can be add in futur

It's not for this pr it's for after merging

• I18n support
• Markdown support
• Unit test

Related Issue

67

[socket-security[bot]]

Socket Security Pull Request Report

Dependency issues detected: If you merge this pull request, you will not be alerted to the instances of these issues again.

📞 Telemetry

This package contains telemetry which tracks you.

Package	Note	Source
next@13.2.1 (added)	Can be disabled by setting the environment variable NEXT_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1	package-lock.json, package.json

Pull request report summary

Issue	Status
Install scripts	✅ 0 issues
Native code	✅ 0 issues
Bin script shell injection	✅ 0 issues
Unresolved require	✅ 0 issues
Invalid package.json	✅ 0 issues
HTTP dependency	✅ 0 issues
Git dependency	✅ 0 issues
Potential typo squat	✅ 0 issues
Known Malware	✅ 0 issues
Telemetry	⚠️ 1 issue
Protestware/Troll package	✅ 0 issues

Bot Commands

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore foo@1.0.0 bar@2.4.2

• @SocketSecurity ignore next@13.2.1

⚠️ Please accept the latest app permissions to ensure bot commands work properly. Accept the new permissions here.

Powered by socket.dev

[rom1504]

CI failing

[AugustinMauroy]

CI failing

MMM it's about telemetry data. What do you thinks? nextjs info

[AugustinMauroy]

To merge I propose to use squash and merge

[AugustinMauroy]

Review is ready !

@rom1504

[rom1504]

CI failing

[rom1504]

This doesn't seem to bring any new features What's the plan on this ?

[AugustinMauroy]

CI failing

IDK why? Because I have add .env with telemetry at off and add socket file to with ignore the package. So idk.

[AugustinMauroy]

This doesn't seem to bring any new features What's the plan on this ?

Technically it's just the migration.

• In long terme I will add one page for one project.
• Support I18n
• Add blog/post (for example: realease note)

[AugustinMauroy]

They are feat added:

• Typescript support
• discord link
• twitter link

[AugustinMauroy]

@rom1504

Can you do the last review ?

And do this @SocketSecurity ignore next@13.1.6

[rom1504]

blocked on adding any new feature (can be done in other PRs)

[rom1504]

this increases the complexity

I think we should rather decrease it

[AugustinMauroy]

It increases the complexity a bit. But it also increases the DX and stability.

[AugustinMauroy]

Oups fail for closing

[rom1504]

apparently it was not clear in my previous messages: if there is no feature added, I think we should not move to next.js

[ghost]

why was this closed

[AugustinMauroy]

https://github.com/PrismarineJS/prismarine-contribute/issues/9