Closed yakutovicha closed 9 months ago
I am not sure it is really an inconsistency. Does not the first test (codecov/patch
) check the percentage of tested lines only within the lines that have been modified while the second (codecov/project
) checks the percentage of tested lines among all lines in the whole ppafm
package? If so, they are really two different tests, which can be expected to give different results. Namely, if you make only a small change, the status of the codecov/project
test is unlikely to change, if it passes before, it probably will after a small change too, if it did not pass before, it will probably keep failing (definitely so unless you added some new tests to cover the change and likely even if you did). So I don't think it is literally a bug to be fixed if codecov/patch
fails while codecov/project
passes, but applying the codecov/patch
may be a too strict criterion at this stage. Should we deactivate it?
should be disabled now. Please reopen in case of problems
Currently, there are two codecov reports, one called
codecov/patch
andcodecov/project
. The first one is constantly failing, while the second one is passing.This inconsistency should be fixed.