FOUR-14905 explorer rail is not working as expected with A B Alternatives

devmiguelangel commented 6 months ago

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Expected behavior: According to the documentation the bottom rail is per user. So both alternatives should have the same element pinned and unpinned

Actual behavior: The PIN/UNPIN controls in the bottom controls are not the same in both alternatives.

[ ] I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
[ ] This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
[ ] This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
[ ] This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
[ ] This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
[ ] This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
[ ] This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
[ ] This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
[ ] This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next

cypress[bot] commented 6 months ago

0

276

83

0

Details:

FOUR-14905 explorer rail is not working as expected with A B Alternatives
Project: modeler	Commit: `5952030b7d`
Status: Passed	Duration: 05:41 💡
Started: Apr 16, 2024 12:43 AM	Ended: Apr 16, 2024 12:49 AM