Open Cryptiiiic opened 3 years ago
Some of the packages listed there are already added, we'd just need to add ag
, bottom
, broot
, cheat
, choose
, curlie
, delta
, dog
, dust
, duf
, glances
, gping
, gtop
, httpie
, hyperfine
, lsd
, mcfly
, procs
, sd
, tldr
, xh
, and zoxide
.
Some of the packages listed there are already added, we'd just need to add
ag
,bottom
,broot
,cheat
,choose
,curlie
,delta
,dog
,dust
,duf
,fd
,glances
,gping
,gtop
,httpie
,hyperfine
,lsd
,mcfly
,procs
,sd
,tldr
,xh
, andzoxide
.
Let's use python3-psutil
instead of bottom
, since a package with that name (that is unrelated to the project) is already in Procursus.
Alternatively, the bottom
package currently on Procursus could be renamed to bottomify
, as that's the name of the binary that's installed with that package.
Some of the packages listed there are already added, we'd just need to add
ag
,bottom
,broot
,cheat
,choose
,curlie
,delta
,dog
,dust
,duf
,fd
,glances
,gping
,gtop
,httpie
,hyperfine
,lsd
,mcfly
,procs
,sd
,tldr
,xh
, andzoxide
.
We already have fd
, so that can be taken off the list as well
Alternatively, the
bottom
package currently on Procursus could be renamed tobottomify
, as that's the name of the binary that's installed with that package.
Well, in reality, packages included in that README are alternatives to alternatives, and these packages have almost the same basic function; I don't see a reason to have gtop
and glances
on the same system, since these packages provide the same basic function.
Well, in reality, packages included in that README are alternatives to alternatives, and these packages have almost the same basic function; I don't see a reason to have
gtop
andglances
on the same system, since these packages provide the same basic function.
Using that logic, what's the point of having htop when we have top, and what's the point of top when we have ps.
The bottom package should always have been called bottomify, or even bottom-rs.
Using that logic, what's the point of having htop when we have top, and what's that point of top when we have ps.
Those have noticeable changes which set them apart entirely; nowadays, these "alternatives" have almost the same features, just a different codebase; I'll likely end up renaming the package unrelated to modern-unix
to something different, just give me time before deciding on the naming of it. This can also apply to bottom
itself, too, since we don't need to follow a strict Debian naming afaik.
Why not just make them separate packages? modern-unix
seems to be just a non-authorative collection made by some random person, the whole repo is just a README. Then that makes the concern about similar functionality moot, because realistically nobody is going to install the entirety of Procursus on their devices, but it's good to have alternatives.
I don't believe the intent of this request was to have all of these utilities bundled into one package, but to have all of them added as separate packages to Procursus, for those who preferred them over alternatives.
realistically nobody is going to install the entirety of Procursus on their devices
Try me.
https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-unix