Progressive-Victory / crm-bot

Internal Discord bot for member utilities
https://progress.win/
MIT License
3 stars 4 forks source link

Proposals Channel Reaction Limits #11

Closed Lewdcario closed 1 year ago

Lewdcario commented 1 year ago
andpeterson commented 1 year ago

This could be resolved by having the directors use one type of emote and everyone else another. Tho if the list of pinged will be changing this may be a better solution

bowenjw commented 1 year ago

I don't Understand the purpose of this function. What is the benefit of the function

Lewdcario commented 1 year ago

@bowenjw simple feature that was requested by one of the advisors to prohibit roles from upvoting reactions which can't be solved by permissions, while keeping the entire channel accessible. Currently the channel is on lockdown as a measure. We can't stop people from upvoting except for asking them not to do so.

bowenjw commented 1 year ago

Why does it matter who reacts to a message post?

andpeterson commented 1 year ago

Disregard my previous comment. I see the error in my understanding now

@bowenjw reactions are currently being used in social-media-proposals channel for the social media lead to get input from the directors on if the directors and related parties approve of a social media post or not as a safety measure. Before adding a lot more members to the channel we'd like to ensure that only specific roles are allowed to react to specific messages Here's an example of a proposed post: image

bowenjw commented 1 year ago

So, if only a limited number of people should be able to react to the posts would it not make sense to just limit the channel to those members?

Lewdcario commented 1 year ago

@bowenjw We want everyone to be able to see it but only certain people be able to add reactions, so people can see the kind of content we're putting out from that channel

bowenjw commented 1 year ago

Do we want to have the about add one of each reaction to the posts?