Project-OSRM / osrm-backend

Open Source Routing Machine - C++ backend
http://map.project-osrm.org
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
6.18k stars 3.28k forks source link

Different Results on different Architectures #6914

Open N40 opened 1 month ago

N40 commented 1 month ago

Issue

I find microscopic differences in routing of osrm-extract on different Architectures

Steps to reproduce

run osrm-extract using a Homebrew installation vs a Linux self-compiled one.

Specifications

Questions

  1. Is OSRM intended to be machine independent (roundings, rng etc)
  2. How could I further debug this?
DennisOSRM commented 1 month ago

What are those macroscopic differences, and what are the architectures involved?

N40 commented 1 month ago

Case A: Different Step count

+ Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3353 m, 15 steps
- Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3148 m, 14 steps

Case B: Different Route Distance

+ Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3148 m, 14 steps
- Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3353 m, 15 steps

I also noticed that the following files differ between two OSRM builds

_.osrm.ebg_nodes
_.osrm.edges
_.osrm.fileIndex
_.osrm.icd
_.osrm.tld

Not in the file size, but in the binary file content.

What I am wondering is, is if the exact same OSRM source code and library dependency version (Boost etc) yields deterministic results independent of the architecture it is built on, or if there is some sort of machine specific calculation results, like float implementations or RNGs.