Open N40 opened 1 month ago
What are those macroscopic differences, and what are the architectures involved?
Case A: Different Step count
+ Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3353 m, 15 steps
- Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3148 m, 14 steps
Case B: Different Route Distance
+ Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3148 m, 14 steps
- Point(10.20715521 53.67772166) -> Point(10.23934191 53.67173931): 411 s , 3353 m, 15 steps
I also noticed that the following files differ between two OSRM builds
_.osrm.ebg_nodes
_.osrm.edges
_.osrm.fileIndex
_.osrm.icd
_.osrm.tld
Not in the file size, but in the binary file content.
What I am wondering is, is if the exact same OSRM source code and library dependency version (Boost etc) yields deterministic results independent of the architecture it is built on, or if there is some sort of machine specific calculation results, like float implementations or RNGs.
Issue
I find microscopic differences in routing of
osrm-extract
on different ArchitecturesSteps to reproduce
run
osrm-extract
using a Homebrew installation vs a Linux self-compiled one.Specifications
v5.7.1
5.27.1_4
5.27.1
, self compiledQuestions