Closed harsha3080 closed 1 year ago
Yes, this should be possible by setting the directions
:
problem.directions[0] = Problem.MINIMIZE
problem.directions[1] = Problem.MINIMIZE
problem.directions[2] = Problem.MAXIMIZE
Hi...Thanks for the reply but it says as it is shown in the attached figure.
Oh, lol...thanks for pointing that out :) I don't remember why I didn't add support for maximizing...
Alternatively, you can negate the objective value instead. Maximizing objective f(x)
is the same as minimizing -f(x)
.
Yeah....thanks dhadka. Let me try that....i am just comparing nsga 2 and nsga 3 for an engineering problem with 3 objectives. Nsga 2 is giving distributed results while nsga 3 is sticking to the small part. Anyway...thanks for the wonderful library.
This issue is stale and will be closed soon. If you feel this issue is still relevant, please comment to keep it active. Please also consider working on a fix and submitting a PR.
Is there any possible way using NSGA III for 3 objectives problem with 2 objectives are minimized and the one should be maximized?