While downloading the data, we noticed that some attributes are missing when compared to the previous datasets. These would be "attribId" and "osmWayId".
If I understand correctly, because this would be the raw data ( not filtered or clustered) then the labels cannot have an attribId as they do not belong to any cluster. Is that correct?
However, would it be possible to have the "osmWayId" for the raw labels, just as we had it for the previous datasets?
Also, when downloading the shapefile for the raw labels using this endpoint https://sidewalk-zurich.cs.washington.edu/api#raw-labels-api, there seems to be a problem with the reference system in the shapefile since when opening it in QGIS, it is imported into a place in Africa. We tried to check and correct the CRS, with no success. It seems like the longitude and latitude values got inversed. This is no longer an issue when downloading the data in a .csv format. Would you know what could cause this and how this could be fixed?
From email: