Closed progval closed 9 years ago
I think it should be (?, gender, genderqueer), not gender∩(genderqueer,owner,?)
(?, gender, genderqueer)
gender∩(genderqueer,owner,?)
Also, it doesn't parse “Who is genderqueer?” correctly ((genderqueer,identity,?) instead of (?, gender, genderqueer)), but I don't think you can do much for that case.
(genderqueer,identity,?)
not parsed correctly (dep relation), the problem comes from the stanford parser
dep
Not solved but registred
I think it should be
(?, gender, genderqueer)
, notgender∩(genderqueer,owner,?)
Also, it doesn't parse “Who is genderqueer?” correctly (
(genderqueer,identity,?)
instead of(?, gender, genderqueer)
), but I don't think you can do much for that case.