Open sneumann opened 3 years ago
It's interpreting it as MSe where the high energy function is treated as MS2. Waters doesn't provide a way to tell the actual instrument model or even the category (triple vs single quad vs qtof). Nor does it provide an easy way to differentiate between 2nd functions that are high-energy MSe from 2nd functions that are some other kind of MS1. Having some more data to look at would be helpful.
Not to mention if the functions are coming from different ionization we should be annotating that in instrumentConfigurationRef.
Hi,
I have data from an SQD2 (not sure what the LCA870 is) https://www.waters.com/waters/en_US/SQ-Detector-2---Single-Quadrupole-Detection/nav.htm?cid=134631584
Function 1 is an ESI+ full scan, Function 2 is an API+ full scan. As you see below, the latter is annotated as an MS2 with CID=3eV from precursor "isolation" 800 +/- 700.
Unless the instrument has a secret TripleQuad upgrade, I don't trust the MS2 annotation.
I checked
_extern.inf
and couldn't find any difference between funcs 1/2 causing this spurious MS2.Functions 3/4 are the same as ESI- and API-, and are all annotated correctly as MS1 in the mzML.
I'll provide the
*.raw
if I get the permission to do so. Or is there anything else I could check that would explain this behaviour ?Yours, Steffen