Open photocyte opened 5 years ago
The general consensus is that putting status and error log info in the output file would be too verbose. We already provide ThermoRawMetaDump which can access those as well as the instrument methods. Instrument method as a big text userParam is one thing that could be potentially interesting to store in the mzML. That wouldn't be too verbose.
Hi there,
I've noticed that Thermo .Raw files have (in a binary format), useful metadata like the sequence (.sld) information associated with the sample injection, and the used instrument method, as well as metadata link the instrument parameters (e.g. Turbopump speed) over the course of the run. This metadata does not make it into a MSConvert converted .mzML file. Would it be possible for MSConvert to maintain this metadata to the best of its ability in the conversion to .mzML format? The sample injection volume & the instrument method used would be especially useful pieces of metadata to transfer. If it is any help to evaluate how difficult implementing this would be, here is a 3rd-party project which interfaces with the proteowizard code to pull out the instrument-related metadata from .raw files: https://bitbucket.org/proteinspector/imondb/wiki/ThermoCompiling
All the best, -Tim