TOML doesn't have a None equivalent, so we're not able to format a None value unless it is the default. Also we wouldn't be able to ever bind None to it, so user code handling None would be redundant.
Maybe this is something to revisit if we ever add JSON support, but for now I think this is an improvement over silently ignoring None values.
TOML doesn't have a
None
equivalent, so we're not able to format aNone
value unless it is the default. Also we wouldn't be able to ever bindNone
to it, so user code handlingNone
would be redundant.Maybe this is something to revisit if we ever add JSON support, but for now I think this is an improvement over silently ignoring
None
values.Closes #31