Closed vladimiry closed 2 years ago
We filter out sensitive parts of the repository before it's published to github, so the exact sha is not relevant. What is relevant is the branch
field, e.g. proton-account@4.5.1
(though we should probably rename this to tag). Which represents the same thing and is what you should use.
Thanks.
It's not apparent to strangers how to correlate the exact repository commit and deployed commit so I think the first impression an average developer would get is that things look a little shady/fishy.
I agree naming the branch like proton-account@4.4.0-<commit>
would bring some more clarity.
I see that version.json includes the branch
field, so that should be enough.
I agree naming the branch like proton-account@4.4.0-
would bring some more clarity.
Or maybe even proton-account@4.4.0-private-<commit>
(private/internal/hidden/etc).
I run the
git show <commit>
for the commits taken from the deployed versions info and get thefatal: bad object <commit>
-like result.Deployed versions info taken from here: https://account.protonmail.com/assets/version.json https://drive.protonmail.com/assets/version.json https://calendar.protonmail.com/assets/version.json https://mail.protonmail.com/assets/version.json
It's required to be able to checkout/reset to the exact deployed repository commit so please make the adjustments.