Closed xet7 closed 3 months ago
his actually applies to other file types too. For a JPEG image this shows "JPEG images" (in plural form, like a file type category name). If these are to be added, there should be separate strings like { var } archive
and { var } image
etc. with a variable for the file type name/extension. Or perhaps the extension is not required here at all since it is under this field in the "MIME type" field anyway?
@olavinto
Or perhaps the extension is not required here at all since it is under this field in the "MIME type" field anyway?
No, the most important info needs to be there.
Some MIME types are really long and complex.
Yeah, but those are special files that do not really concern basic users. All common archive or image types etc. are pretty much equally simple. And a user who is not able to read "jpeg" (or whatever) from the MIME type probably doesn't know what JPEG means in the fild type field either (the only understand that it's an image file). Also file extensions are shown so those also specify this (something Windows doesn't do as default - a huge reason why "file extension" is a foreign concept for many).
@olavinto
I really need info in file type, is it PNG image or SVG image. Those require different software for editing. Critical info should not be removed.
Both have MIME types and it's right next to the type field anyway. image/svg+xml image/png
There's also the question of where the information comes from. Is it detected by actually reading a file's content or is it simply based on its extension in which case the field should simply be file extension (and the extension is also included in the file name, right above these fields, twice if screen space allows, once on smaller screens plus the MIME type)?
But still, I have nothing against the information being there. It's just a tad repetitive.
@olavinto
In Linux can be run some command like file something.jpg
that looks actual file content, so even when there is not correct file extension, it shows correct file type.
I would presume, that because Protonmail runs in browser, there is some similar Javascript npm package that detects file type, and shows it at browser. I don't know that are those text translatable at all, are they only part of that package.
Sure, after detecting file type, there could run some function that detects from result text, is there word like image
that could be translated to Finnish.
I also don't know is there some Javascript NPM package where file types are already translated.
This was done in dc485b8023fdcdb2b7a87da006603af1dd2eb1bf, thank you for spotting this :sparkles:
Please complete the following checklist (by adding [x]):
Hi, can this file type be made translateable?