I notice that neither this repo nor a handful of related repos[0] contain a LICENSE, though some of them list "ISC" in their package.json.
It would be good to include this information in a LICENSE file. If ISC is the desired license (as reflected in ProtonMail/design-system), then the ISC license text should be included in LICENSE:
Copyright \<YEAR> \<OWNER>
Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
I notice that neither this repo nor a handful of related repos[0] contain a LICENSE, though some of them list "ISC" in their
package.json.It would be good to include this information in a
LICENSEfile. If ISC is the desired license (as reflected in ProtonMail/design-system), then the ISC license text should be included inLICENSE:[0] ProtonMail/proton-translations, ProtonMail/proton-shared, ProtonMail/proton-pack, ProtonMail/react-components
I also submitted ProtonMail/proton-version#3 for
proton-versionsince it has conflicting package license and LICENSE files.