Closed kaglowka closed 5 years ago
I guess these changes were rather preliminary and were followed by much thorough works, so the #313 is actually the proper one which will be merged soon, while this one can just be closed, right @kaglowka ?
No, they are completely independent :) probably with minor conflicts
But isn't this one containing some incomplete changes, e.g. mocking that was fixed later on?
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 02:54 kaglowka, notifications@github.com wrote:
No, they are completely independent :) probably with minor conflicts
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PrzypisPowszechny/pp-client/pull/312#issuecomment-469092092, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFSs-E90kq9FrGBkyfIWn8vnQkpgPhqxks5vTHzLgaJpZM4bQri5 .
No, I removed the dev client mock + there is no differentiation between the type of storage used in dev and production (all use chrome.storage.local
and never chrome.storage.sync
).
The next PR adds chrome API mock in jest
tests.
Resolve #289 For now we use only
chrome.storage.local
. We might switch later tosync
if we need any kind of data to be shared between browser instances.