Open ozwaldorf opened 2 years ago
This addresses the use case I have in mind for "developer properties" perfectly. @ozwaldorf I'd like to get some comments from others on my other suggestions as well: multiple asset locations in metadata beyond location and thumbnail. Should I create a separate PR for that?
A PR would be much appreciated! Along with this though, do you think we should move all the reserved properties to the private _
namespace? So location
would be _location
, _location1
, etc; thumbnail
would be _thumbnail
, _thumbnail2
, etc
do you think we should move all the reserved properties to the private
_
namespace? Solocation
would be_location
,_location1
, etc;thumbnail
would be_thumbnail
,_thumbnail2
, etc
Fair point. Let's discuss in the new PR.
Why?
Based on some feedback from the community (cc @jorgenbuilder ), there is a need for specifying if a given key value should be displayed in frontends (eg; plug wallet's trait chips).
This also removes the requirement of the data blob, as storing large amounts of data in the meta is not recommended, due to the IC's 2MB message limit.
How?
Adds the
_
prefix for private properties to the specRemoved reserved property
data
Tickets?
n.a
Contribution checklist?
Security checklist?
n.a
Demo?
n.a