nrshapiro
commented
1 year ago Open nrshapiro opened 1 year ago
nrshapiro
commented
1 year ago 
jordanallen-dev
commented
1 year ago Moved from Psychoanalytic-Electronic-Publishing/PEP-Web-User-Interface#745
@SophieMBennett @davidtuckett @ocappello @jordanallen-dev @nadinelevinson
The section heading issue is fixed in our system to the extent that articles are now correctly placed in the category, as long as the newsecnm info is correctly coded.
However, note that the client resorts the article and organizes the sections "by section". This is not the order Taylor and Francis uses, and perhaps not the best order to provide the contiguity of "article - discussion - response". That could be revisited, but the logic of reorganizing would be a bit complex since the client would have to consider the semantics of the section name, and then sort by page number.
The T&F section naming is also a bit awkard because there are so many section headings.
To my mind, the best way to so this is to introduce section levels.
Article is a section level. Discussion is a subsection and could also include response, or it could be a subsection label as well, though I don't think it's necessary. (T&F may in fact be doing this since ARTICLE is all upper case, and Discussion and reply are mixed case), and seem to be "grouped" by shading.)
Where are you seeing this interface? I've not seen it in PEP-Web yet
Moved from https://github.com/Psychoanalytic-Electronic-Publishing/PEP-Web-User-Interface/issues/745
@SophieMBennett @davidtuckett @ocappello @jordanallen-dev @nadinelevinson
The section heading issue is fixed in our system to the extent that articles are now correctly placed in the category, as long as the newsecnm info is correctly coded.
However, note that the client resorts the article and organizes the sections "by section". This is not the order Taylor and Francis uses, and perhaps not the best order to provide the contiguity of "article - discussion - response". That could be revisited, but the logic of reorganizing would be a bit complex since the client would have to consider the semantics of the section name, and then sort by page number.
The T&F section naming is also a bit awkard because there are so many section headings.
To my mind, the best way to so this is to introduce section levels.
Article is a section level. Discussion is a subsection and could also include response, or it could be a subsection label as well, though I don't think it's necessary. (T&F may in fact be doing this since ARTICLE is all upper case, and Discussion and reply are mixed case), and seem to be "grouped" by shading.)