PsychoinformaticsLab / pliers

Automated feature extraction in Python
https://pliers.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
296 stars 68 forks source link

FIx Tests #477

Closed adelavega closed 2 years ago

adelavega commented 2 years ago

Due to many upgrades (in particular Librosa), many tests are failing due to slightly different values.

I'm relaxing many tests to prevent this from happening so frequently.

NLTK also requires more granular resource management now.

codecov-commenter commented 2 years ago

Codecov Report

Base: 75.89% // Head: 75.64% // Decreases project coverage by -0.25% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (6e35af0) compared to base (32e41e1). Patch coverage: 52.94% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #477 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 75.89% 75.64% -0.26% ========================================== Files 65 65 Lines 3854 3876 +22 ========================================== + Hits 2925 2932 +7 - Misses 929 944 +15 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pliers/extractors/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2V4dHJhY3RvcnMvX19pbml0X18ucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [pliers/extractors/api/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2V4dHJhY3RvcnMvYXBpL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [pliers/extractors/api/microsoft.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2V4dHJhY3RvcnMvYXBpL21pY3Jvc29mdC5weQ==) | `33.33% <ø> (-1.12%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pliers/extractors/text.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2V4dHJhY3RvcnMvdGV4dC5weQ==) | `96.28% <40.00%> (-0.72%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pliers/stimuli/text.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL3N0aW11bGkvdGV4dC5weQ==) | `86.82% <40.00%> (-1.98%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pliers/filters/text.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2ZpbHRlcnMvdGV4dC5weQ==) | `89.21% <52.38%> (-9.61%)` | :arrow_down: | | [pliers/extractors/models.py](https://codecov.io/gh/PsychoinformaticsLab/pliers/pull/477/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab#diff-cGxpZXJzL2V4dHJhY3RvcnMvbW9kZWxzLnB5) | `93.93% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PsychoinformaticsLab)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

adelavega commented 2 years ago

Hallelujah!