Closed Moohan closed 3 years ago
I don't think this is that big a deal - different packages having functions of the same name is pretty unavoidable. I don't think it's worth the effort bending over backwards trying to ensure that our function names are 100% unique, particularly to avoid masking something so obscure. Of course this would be different if we were masking something like mutate
, but I'm content to just leave this as is. People can use ::
if they really need to use both in the same script.
file_size
is maskingfile_size
from fs. fs is not core tidyverse but is included so would be ideal if it wasn't masked.I think the simplest solution would be to just rename the function when dealing with issue #11.