Closed Jennit07 closed 4 months ago
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
Update the 00_Sort_BI_Extracts.R
to
It works well as I tested. But I do have a question about the new file name. Since we have added a prefix "anon-" for those files, will it break the existing data pipeline? If so, we should
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
Update the
00_Sort_BI_Extracts.R
to
- enable parallel computing
- tell whether a file have a chi column or not
It works well as I tested. But I do have a question about the new file name. Since we have added a prefix "anon-" for those files, will it break the existing data pipeline? If so, we should
- modify the functions which pick up those files. OR,
- we just do not add the prefix to file names.
Hi @lizihao-anu Thanks for all your help with this. We want to keep the anon-
prefix for consistency as the updated get_boxi_extract
path has renamed this for all extracts when we are changing everything to anon_chi
. I have made the changes we have discussed and also tested a file. I am happy the function is working as intended.
I will mark this PR ready for review. Could you please do a final check to confirm you are happy with this and then approve/merge into the June24 update branch. Thanks! :)
See the :open_file_folder: files view, the :scroll:action log, or :memo: job summary for details.
sourcedev
OR
To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line: @check-spelling-bot apply updates.
As part of ensuring anon-chi is used on disk, an update to sort bi extract script. Opening as a draft for now as this works for extracts with
chi
variable available but we do take some extracts without chi e.g. gp ooh data. Some thought is needed to expand the code to work around this. Possibly a conditional statement.