search

PyPSA / pypsa-ariadne

MIT License
6 stars 4 forks source link

Uba trajectory for climate targets #86

Closed toniseibold closed 1 month ago

toniseibold commented 1 month ago

Partially addressing issue https://github.com/PyPSA/pypsa-ariadne/issues/81 Sector goals are not easily applicable, since due to sector coupling PyPSA-Eur can't distinguish between e.g. oil/hydrogen for different applications. New config co2_budget_uba was added. In build_scenarios the trajectory from 2024 is added minus the expected non CO2 emissions from the iiasa database. The relative reduction is then written into config["co2_budget_uba"]["targets"] but only come into effect if config["co2_budget_uba"]["enable"] == True.

Reduction compared to 1990 emissions Year uba KSG
2020 0.61 0.728
2025 0.557 0.573
2030 0.391 0.401
2035 0.268 0.265
2040 0.177 0.135
2045 0.151 -0.011

Waiting for decision whether to implement a electricity sector target.

toniseibold commented 1 month ago

So far we are using config["co2_budget_national"] for Germany only. That's why I wrote the code so that it is either using the uba or the ksg targets.