Closed toniseibold closed 4 weeks ago
So far we are using config["co2_budget_national"]
for Germany only. That's why I wrote the code so that it is either using the uba or the ksg targets.
Wanted to squash my PR, which I did, but it lead to some hickups. Sorry for that
superseded by #93
Partially addressing issue https://github.com/PyPSA/pypsa-ariadne/issues/81 Sector goals are not easily applicable, since due to sector coupling PyPSA-Eur can't distinguish between e.g. oil/hydrogen for different applications. New config
co2_budget_uba
was added. Inbuild_scenarios
the trajectory from 2024 is added minus the expected non CO2 emissions from the iiasa database. The relative reduction is then written intoconfig["co2_budget_uba"]["targets"]
but only come into effect ifconfig["co2_budget_uba"]["enable"] == True
.Waiting for decision whether to implement a electricity sector target.