Closed zeth closed 9 years ago
"Looks good, but it's really hard to review this because all the column widths have changed -- could we avoid this in future?"
Not really, that is kinda the whole point. Cannot dumb down the whole thing just for a bad diff implementation.
OK -- sorta take your point. GH usually highlights the parts of lines that have changed, like this:
It hadn't done so here, so I'd assumed that more had changed than actually had.
Let me know if you've got any better suggestions for reviewing this kind of diff.
Build the site then local in one window, live one in one window, then apply mark one eyeball!
There was an idea next year to go AI and have George's talk review app end with a schedule, that might reduce some of the pain.
On 12 September 2015 at 13:07, Peter Inglesby notifications@github.com wrote:
OK -- sorta take your point. GH usually highlights the parts of lines that have changed, like this:
[image: image] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/28734/9831414/c5eb0c90-594e-11e5-9b21-aaf24249e973.png
It hadn't done so here, so I'd assumed that more had changed than actually had.
Let me know if you've got any better suggestions for reviewing this kind of diff.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/PyconUK/pyconuk.org/pull/166#issuecomment-139752070.
Looks good, but it's really hard to review this because all the column widths have changed -- could we avoid this in future?
Using the tool in #163 (any chance that could be merged?) has helped.