PygmalionOfCyprus / cmo-db-requests

Public issue/request tracking for the Command: Modern Operations database
49 stars 17 forks source link

Russia - AA-10s Alamo [R-27] #1254

Closed claudejdev closed 2 years ago

claudejdev commented 2 years ago

DB Selector

DB3K

Affected DBID(s)

*

Summary of Changes


DataSensor

Notes

R stands for Radiynaya. Radiolocation/Radar T stands for Teplovaya. Heat/Thermal P stands for Passivnaya. E stands for Energeticheskaya. Energy/Power, Energetic.

Interestingly, as of 2017, and since 1983, all R-27 were produced at the Artem factory in Kiev, Ukraine. (Butowski) That factory would have been destroyed in late April 2022 : Russia says struck Kyiv rocket plant with missiles | Reuters

Sources

GosMKB Vympel » Guided air-to-air missiles Artem - Air-to-air missile R-27

Cool illustrations from Artem's : image imageimage image image image image

PygmalionOfCyprus commented 2 years ago

Fixed for 495.

Re: the deletions and things not worth their weight, I agree, but I can't remove anything from the database once a new version has been released for reasons of backwards compatibility w/ pro client custom DBs and older scenario migration.

claudejdev commented 2 years ago

Fixed for 495.

Re: the deletions and things not worth their weight, I agree, but I can't remove anything from the database once a new version has been released for reasons of backwards compatibility w/ pro client custom DBs and older scenario migration.

Understandable. You would then flag and comment them as Depreciated?

KLABDB3K commented 2 years ago

The only observation I would make is that the R-27R1 etc export variants are "different" in terms of their ECCM, and codes for datalinks etc which are not immediately obvious as being modelled in the current CMO. It seems prudent to keep them not just for backward compatibility and ease of administration but also in case of a future incarnation of the sim starts to effectively model comms jamming or a more elaborate ECCM model?

PygmalionOfCyprus commented 2 years ago

^ I believe this is why they're in there. I'm generally in favor of modeling export variants even if just as copies because there are usually differences even if they aren't immediately modelable/apparent -- and it's way easier to change a single weapon entry down the line than go through and replace every loadout for foreign aircraft w/ export variants later.

claudejdev commented 2 years ago

That makes senses. Thanks for elaborating.

Would you want me to post suggested changes for the export variants too? The same as on the national version, though.

As for the P1, I've asked around to know if it actually has been exported. Waiting for an answer.