Closed LuigiP57 closed 1 month ago
Not really. C band antenna was integrated on type 346 and 346A (see #5052),
The ticket needs more consideration. At the moment, I think it should be possible to increase the number of SARH illuminations for 054B MFR to make the simulation more appropriate.
DB Selector
DB3K
Affected DBID(s)
weapon 4362
Summary of Changes
If we look at the HQ-16C and HQ-16A/B, we can easily find that the white transparent material part of the HQ-16C warhead is significantly different from that of the A/B, which is likely to replace the larger and more complex old semi-active radar seeker with a lighter active-semi active hybrid radar seeker.
In addition, we note that the 054B does not have any signs of suspected semi-active missile fire control radar, but has the same data link antenna as the 055 and 052d series. The 054A batch IV & V also replaced the original FCR with some kind of phased array, and if we think that the 054b and 054A batch IV & V used the same weapon, then what we originally thought of as "phased array FCR" was just some kind of data link antenna (while having limited ability to illuminate targets for Semi-Active guidance) used to guide active radar missiles.
Sources
https://twitter.com/Nickatgreat1220/status/1823720586776076796 https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/054b-new-generation-frigate.8724/page-216 https://www.china-arms.com/2023/10/china-improved-054a-frigate-launches-hq16c-missile/