PygmalionOfCyprus / cmo-db-requests

Public issue/request tracking for the Command: Modern Operations database
53 stars 17 forks source link

Add 3 Forward Base Facilities for RLM-M, RLM-D, RLM-S (Nebo-M Radars) #5057

Open sr71xx opened 2 months ago

sr71xx commented 2 months ago

DB Selector

DB3K

DBID to Copy

Facility 1848, 1847, 1846,

Hypothetical

No

Name

Radar (Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M]) Forward Based Modes

Country

Russia

Service

Air Force

In Commission

2017-present

Number in Service

12x

Sensors

(Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-M VHF-Band) Forward Based Mode (Facility 1846, Sensor 4556) (Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-D L-Band) Forward Based Mode (Facility 1847, Sensor 4558) (Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-D S-Band) Forward Based Mode (Facility 1848, Sensor 4557)

Mounts

No response

Loadout Options

No response

Other Changes

For all 3 radars (RLM-D, M, S):

_Increase max range to 1000km (540nmi) Decrease azimuthal arc to 90 degrees Elevation angle 80 degrees Air search, ABM/Space Search, same properties_ Brochure says 1800km but that is only for ballistic targets. The real figure is 1000km as speculated by TASS and other RU media sources, which includes both aerial and ballistic targets. nebo 5 nebo 2 nebo 4 nebo 1

(Each of the 3 radar facilities have 600km range in circular mode and 1800km in stop/stare mode, according to the export brochure) But more likely the real figure is 1000km for each radar in forward based mode as confirmed my RU media sources

Name for each facility: Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-M VHF-Band) Forward Based Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-M L-Band) Forward Based Tall Rack [55Zh6M Nebo M, RLM-M S-Band) Forward Based

Sources

https://www.newsweek.com/satellite-images-russia-nebo-m-radar-luhansk-strike-atacms-1905657#:~:text=Russia's%20state%2Drun%20news%20agency,kilometers%20(about%20620%20miles). nebo brochure.pdf

sr71xx commented 2 months ago

hopefully not a duplicate of a prior request... apologies in advance if so

sr71xx commented 2 months ago

@PygmalionOfCyprus @RickDNiu I suppose this would also be related to the question of programmable radars as in ticket #5056