I have encountered an issue with the DummyMailer class in pyramid_mailer. The send method of DummyMailer does not return a value, whereas the send method of the actual Mailer class returns a success value (e.g., True). This discrepancy can cause problems in unit tests where the code under test relies on the return value of send to determine if an email was sent successfully.
Details:
In the Mailer class, the send method is defined as follows:
def send(self, message):
"""Send a message.
The message is handled inside a transaction, so in case of failure
(or the message fails) the message will not be sent.
:param message: a 'Message' instance.
"""
return self.direct_delivery.send(*self._message_args(message))
As you can see, it returns the result of self.direct_delivery.send, which typically indicates the success of the operation.
However, in the DummyMailer class used for testing, the send method does not return any value:
class DummyMailer(object):
# ...
def send(self, message):
"""Mock sending a transactional message via SMTP.
The message is appended to the 'outbox' list.
:param message: a 'Message' instance.
"""
self.outbox.append(message)
# No return value here
This difference leads to issues in tests where the application code depends on the return value of send. For example:
result = request.registry['mailer'].send(message)
if not result:
# Handle the failure case
pass
In this scenario, since DummyMailer.send returns None, the condition not result evaluates to True, and the code incorrectly assumes that the email sending failed, even though it was added to the outbox.
Proposed Solution:
Modify the DummyMailer.send method to return a success value, consistent with the Mailer.send method. For instance:
This change would ensure that tests using DummyMailer behave consistently with the actual mailer, and prevent false negatives in test assertions.
Additional Considerations:
The same issue may exist with other methods in DummyMailer, such as send_immediately, send_to_queue, etc. It would be beneficial to review these methods to ensure they also return appropriate success values if the real Mailer methods do.
Ensuring that DummyMailer mimics the behavior of Mailer as closely as possible is crucial for accurate testing and reliable test results.
Environment:
pyramid_mailer version: [Please specify]
Python version: [Please specify]
Operating system: [Please specify]
Steps to Reproduce:
Write application code that relies on the return value of mailer.send to determine success.
In unit tests, use DummyMailer from pyramid_mailer.testing.
Observe that mailer.send returns None during tests, causing the application code to misinterpret the result.
Expected Behavior:
The DummyMailer.send method should return a value indicating success (e.g., True), matching the behavior of the real Mailer.send method.
Actual Behavior:
DummyMailer.send does not return any value, resulting in None, which can be misinterpreted as a failure in application code that relies on the return value.
Possible Workarounds:
Manually patching DummyMailer in tests to return True.
Modifying application code to not rely on the return value of send, although this may not be feasible in all cases.
Request:
I kindly request that the DummyMailer class be updated so that its methods return values consistent with the Mailer class methods. This change would improve the reliability of tests and ensure consistent behavior between testing and production environments.
Hello,
I have encountered an issue with the
DummyMailer
class inpyramid_mailer
. Thesend
method ofDummyMailer
does not return a value, whereas thesend
method of the actualMailer
class returns a success value (e.g.,True
). This discrepancy can cause problems in unit tests where the code under test relies on the return value ofsend
to determine if an email was sent successfully.Details:
In the
Mailer
class, thesend
method is defined as follows:As you can see, it returns the result of
self.direct_delivery.send
, which typically indicates the success of the operation.However, in the
DummyMailer
class used for testing, thesend
method does not return any value:This difference leads to issues in tests where the application code depends on the return value of
send
. For example:In this scenario, since
DummyMailer.send
returnsNone
, the conditionnot result
evaluates toTrue
, and the code incorrectly assumes that the email sending failed, even though it was added to theoutbox
.Proposed Solution:
Modify the
DummyMailer.send
method to return a success value, consistent with theMailer.send
method. For instance:This change would ensure that tests using
DummyMailer
behave consistently with the actual mailer, and prevent false negatives in test assertions.Additional Considerations:
The same issue may exist with other methods in
DummyMailer
, such assend_immediately
,send_to_queue
, etc. It would be beneficial to review these methods to ensure they also return appropriate success values if the realMailer
methods do.Ensuring that
DummyMailer
mimics the behavior ofMailer
as closely as possible is crucial for accurate testing and reliable test results.Environment:
Steps to Reproduce:
mailer.send
to determine success.DummyMailer
frompyramid_mailer.testing
.mailer.send
returnsNone
during tests, causing the application code to misinterpret the result.Expected Behavior:
The
DummyMailer.send
method should return a value indicating success (e.g.,True
), matching the behavior of the realMailer.send
method.Actual Behavior:
DummyMailer.send
does not return any value, resulting inNone
, which can be misinterpreted as a failure in application code that relies on the return value.Possible Workarounds:
DummyMailer
in tests to returnTrue
.send
, although this may not be feasible in all cases.Request:
I kindly request that the
DummyMailer
class be updated so that its methods return values consistent with theMailer
class methods. This change would improve the reliability of tests and ensure consistent behavior between testing and production environments.Thank you for your attention to this matter.