Closed AntonReinhard closed 4 days ago
Thanks for the fast PR! Looks good for me. Will merge if the pipeline succeeds.
Edit: Oh, the tests, you are right 😅
Yes, almost forgot :sweat_smile: Should be good if the pipeline goes through :+1: Feel free to merge then.
Edit: Right, it won't succeed. It now needs the implementations from QEDbase. I think we need to target this branch in the QEDbase integration tests, then merge the QEDbase PR, then merge this one.
Thanks for the fast PR! Looks good for me. Will merge if the pipeline succeeds. Edit: Oh, the tests, you are right 😅
Yes, almost forgot 😅 Should be good if the pipeline goes through 👍 Feel free to merge then.
Edit: Right, it won't succeed. It now needs the implementations from QEDbase. I think we need to target this branch in the QEDbase integration tests, then merge the QEDbase PR, then merge this one.
Could you please add
CI_UNIT_PKG_URL_QEDbase: https://github.com/szabo137/QEDbase.jl#2492e986972de30fadd68cd7fa7946dc4d888a61
to your last commit message? Then the unit tests should succeed. If so, we can tell https://github.com/QEDjl-project/QEDbase.jl/pull/87 to use this fix here and merge it. Afterwards we can merge here.
Something seems to break with the pipeline. It finds and clones the correct QEDbase version, but somehow there seems to be a git merge happening in the Project.toml, leading to a parsing error
Something seems to break with the pipeline. It finds and clones the correct QEDbase version, but somehow there seems to be a git merge happening in the Project.toml, leading to a parsing error
My bad, wrong commit hash 🤦♂️ This is the correct one: fb4c800acc99ffe83efe558a5a094e63eed9abde
Please remove the CI_UNIT_PKG_URL_QEDbase from the last commit message and force push again.. this should use the current QEDbase#dev
and therefore should pass the tests.
The implementations of the cross sections and probability functions for abstract processes have moved to QEDbase, see https://github.com/QEDjl-project/QEDbase.jl/pull/87. They are therefore now deleted here.
Fixes issue https://github.com/QEDjl-project/QEDbase.jl/issues/86