QIB-Sheffield / wezel

Prototyping quantitative medical imaging applications
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 6 forks source link

DICOM headers appear to be wrong #82

Open JoaoPeriquito opened 1 year ago

JoaoPeriquito commented 1 year ago

DICOM headers from View -> Series (headers) do not correspond to the right image. It appears to me it always show the DICOM headers of the first image of the series (this is valid for Philips and Siemens data)

plaresmedima commented 1 year ago

Yes that is indeed what it is doing. I have been meaning to add a slider at the bottom so you can navigate through the headers of individual images. Can you create an issue in wezel if it is not yet there?

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 12:24 JoaoPeriquito, @.***> wrote:

DICOM headers from View -> Series (headers) do not correspond to the right image. It appears to me it always show the DICOM headers of the first image of the series (this is valid for Philips and Siemens data)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/QIB-Sheffield/wezel/issues/82, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOFKA2AHNUXCSXFKRFULATW5BEAJANCNFSM6AAAAAAWBALBOY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

JoaoPeriquito commented 1 year ago

This is an issue in wezel, isn't it? Did you mean something different?

plaresmedima commented 1 year ago

yes all good sorry

Prof. Steven Sourbron, PhD Chair in Medical Imaging Physics University of Sheffield, UK https https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/medicine/people/iicd/steven-sourbron://www.sheffield.ac.uk/medicine/people/iicd/steven-sourbron https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/medicine/people/iicd/steven-sourbron Sheffield abdominal imaging research page https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/medicine/research/research-themes/medical-imaging/medical-imaging-research/abdominal-imaging Open source initiative in perfusion imaging http://www.osipi.org Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for chronic kidney disease https://renalmri.org/

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 14:44, JoaoPeriquito @.***> wrote:

This is an issue in wezel, isn't it? Did you mean something different?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/QIB-Sheffield/wezel/issues/82#issuecomment-1476363544, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOFKA3B6AP4VYCUV4EUVFLW5BULPANCNFSM6AAAAAAWBALBOY . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>