Closed lshulen closed 5 years ago
Post-deadline, should we do this in mainline QMCPACK?
It is worth looking into. Some of this may be mitigated by the fact that mainline qmcpack may actually be doing batched evaluation. However, for ~5000 electron problems, switching from the batched version to the cusolver version could be the difference between 10 s spent under the initialization timer and ~200 s spent under that timer. It’s a relatively easy switch to make, so it would be worth looking at.
Luke
From: "Paul R. C. Kent" notifications@github.com Reply-To: QMCPACK/miniqmc reply@reply.github.com Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM To: QMCPACK/miniqmc miniqmc@noreply.github.com Cc: "Shulenburger, Luke" lshulen@sandia.gov, State change state_change@noreply.github.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [QMCPACK/miniqmc] swap cublas batched getrf/getri for cusolver getrf/getrs, drastically… (#191)
Post-deadline, should we do this in mainline QMCPACK?
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/QMCPACK/miniqmc/pull/191#issuecomment-424854499, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXMsFVBZDRl3HJAElapCA1wA9npZYMtbks5ue-BQgaJpZM4W7Vce.
… improve initialization on gpus