Closed alphaville closed 7 months ago
Base-rover configuration seems to be quite straightforward as shown in this video
There's also this SparkFun breakout with the same module, but seems to be smaller (43.5 mm x 43.2 mm ). It's just slightly more expensive (£233). Its weight is 23.4 g. See also https://www.mouser.co.uk/new/sparkfun/sparkfun-gps-rtk-sma-breakout/.
There's also this little thing from ArduSimple.
https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/SparkFun/GPS-16481?qs=vmHwEFxEFR8xw%2FiWbXmISw%3D%3D
I think this one would be best value for money as its refresh rate is only 5hz below the more expensive version, as well as that its well documented and we can use it with a usb port.
https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/SparkFun/GPS-16481?qs=vmHwEFxEFR8xw%2FiWbXmISw%3D%3D
I think this one would be best value for money as its refresh rate is only 5hz below the more expensive version, as well as that its well documented and we can use it with a usb port.
This uses RTK to give an update rate of 20Hz. We'd have to buy two of these (one for the quadcopter and one for the base station), but this is within our budget.
Which is the more expensive version you're referring to?
would we have to buy two of these also?
if not it might be beneficial to go with that one as it will work out cheaper
would we have to buy two of these also?
In the product description they say "With a clear view of the sky, specifically to the South, this combo breakout will deliver centimeter-level accuracy positioning without needing separate RTK or NTRIP corrections!" and "With this board, you will know where your (or any object's) X, Y, and Z location is better than an inch without needing a separate correction source!"
I haven't found a comparison between the two modules, though. It would be also good to know whether it works reliable around our corner of the Earth.
Just a thought: if we get two SparkFun GPS-16481 we have two potential advantages: (i) we can get a NEO module later and connect it to the ZED-F9P, (ii) we'll have redundancy: if one module gets fried, most likely we'll still get decent accuracy and be able to fly (e.g., using SSR corrections).
it illustrates the it is operational around the us and Europe, but its quite vague. I suppose if we found a video of someone using it in the uk we could find out that way
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSkIvtaVZc0
this video is quite useful
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSkIvtaVZc0
this video is quite useful
Good find! Indeed, Mosaic X5 looks great, but it's at £610. However, it provides update rates at 100Hz and sub-cm errors.
Some additional information we need to be aware of:
This is what SparkFun says about RTK:
[...] an RTK receiver takes in an RTCM correction stream and then calculates your location with 1cm accuracy in real time. [...] You’ll also need a source of RTCM correction data. This usually comes from an internet connection or a long distance radio capable of approximately 500 bytes per second. LoRa and LTE-CAT M1 are superb choices for this backhaul.
More precisely we can get RTCM Corrections:
In anycase, unless we need to fly far away from Belfast (>10km from harbour), we won't need to make our own NTRIP server.
Sparkfun Mosaic X5 still seems like a good idea, but without RTCM corrections the accuracy will be poor (around ±1.5m). However, we can get correction data from the Belfast station. The only downside is that an Internet connection is required, but I've already ordered a 4G-enabled WiFi router, so we'll have a connection anywhere we go.
@pdavid747, @jamie-54, @Runway27, @Yuanbwcx, @Minanchi thoughts?
Hi all the Sparkfun Mosaic X5
seems like a pretty good option, and so does the Sparkfun Combo
if it work straight out of the box. It says it should in Europe which is a bit vague so trying to see if there's any review for UK.
Either way both options seem to be cheapest from unmanned tech
Sparkfun Mosaic X5 = £610
Sparkfun Combo = £300
Market research for GNSS modules/antennas
I'm looking for high-precision GNSS modules. These ArduSimple simpleRTK2Blite Multiband GNSS Boards seems to be good candidates. They are priced at around £214 on Mouser.
If we get a couple of modules, my understanding is that we can operate them in a base-rover configuration.
Just before I order this, can we check that (i) it's appropriate for our application, (ii) it's not too large and we're happy with the size, (iii) we've done a proper market research.
Comparison
Criteria to take into account:
** This is our runner-up; please review carefully @jamie-54 @pdavid747 @Runway27 @Yuanbwcx @Minanchi
Antennas
Requirements:
Literature review
It is useful to see what people in the literature has used for navigation applications.
Compass
The above modules don't have a compass, but (i) we'll have two IMUs on board and both have a magnetometer, (ii) the anemometer most likely has a compass - the Bosch IMU should be quite good; (iii) worst case, we can get a cheap compass like this one and position it away from the other electronics, (iv) we can do sensor fusion.
[^1]: ZED-F9P Data Sheet, p. 8