QasimRiaz / akomantoso

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/akomantoso
0 stars 1 forks source link

The TLCConcept element needs to be documented better #4

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
A top-level-class element TLCConcept introduced with the most recent Akoma
Ntoso release neeeds to be documented better.  What would be its usage ?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ashok.ha...@gmail.com on 26 Oct 2007 at 2:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
All TLC elements are explained in section 15.8. It's not much of an 
explanation, but it is systematic and correct. I 
don't see any particular reason to explain Concept in any better detail than 
any of the other classes of the 
ontology. 

Original comment by fvit...@gmail.com on 26 Oct 2007 at 10:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Probably here there has been a misunderstanding.

The issue raised by Ashok is a "request for clarifications/improvements". May 
be we
should find a way to clearly distinguish between "bugs", "request for
additions/deletions", "request of clarifications", etc.

I think we all agree that all questions are legitimate and nobody should 
refrain from
asking questions, not matter what (of course relevant to the topics of the 
list).

Original comment by flavio.z...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2007 at 12:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by fvit...@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2007 at 5:03