use txadmin noclip

[DevX32]

Description

Checklist

• [x] I have personally loaded this code into an updated Qbox project and checked all of its functionality.
• [x] My pull request fits the contribution guidelines & code conventions.

[DevX32]

need to fix the noclip command searching for the txadmin event

[DevX32]

@Manason

[solareon]

So the issue I see with this one is does it work if you don't have txadmin perms to no clip? Some server owners/admins may not want to give txadmin permissions to folks hence the desire for an alternative noclip

[DevX32]

So the issue I see with this one is does it work if you don't have txadmin perms to no clip? Some server owners/admins may not want to give txadmin permissions to folks hence the desire for an alternative noclip

but server owners can give only noclip access though i asked manason he said its good though

[DevX32]

i dont think there is diffrence between the tx noclip and normal admin one though

[mafewtm]

If this required server owners to add people to the cfg just for noclip access, I think we should stick with what we have already

[Manason]

Needs to be tested in a scenario where a non-owner admin without txAdmin access can noclip

[Manason]

If this required server owners to add people to the cfg just for noclip access, I think we should stick with what we have already

I assume you are talking about ACE permissions, but that can be done at runtime using ox_lib.

[BerkieBb]

If this required server owners to add people to the cfg just for noclip access, I think we should stick with what we have already

That doesn't make sense as we use the cfg for all our permissions too

[mafewtm]

If this required server owners to add people to the cfg just for noclip access, I think we should stick with what we have already

That doesn't make sense as we use the cfg for all our permissions too

It makes perfect sense. Why have to set another permission for someone when you can just set them as mod and it deals with noclip already.

[BerkieBb]

If this required server owners to add people to the cfg just for noclip access, I think we should stick with what we have already

That doesn't make sense as we use the cfg for all our permissions too

It makes perfect sense. Why have to set another permission for someone when you can just set them as mod and it deals with noclip already.

We can incorporate that in the mod group

[mafewtm]

We should just maintain our own version of noclip