Closed kt474 closed 1 year ago
@rathishcholarajan can you take a look
@renier
So I'm a bit confused here, what is the status of qiskit-ibm-provider if we're telling people to use the runtime client instead? They're not equivalent sets of functionality. I get you're adding an interface for doing backend.run()
via the circuit runner, but is that all that's needed? What about the other IQX api functionality? Also what about the in progress PRs like: https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-provider/pull/365 ?
So I'm a bit confused here, what is the status of qiskit-ibm-provider if we're telling people to use the runtime client instead? They're not equivalent sets of functionality. I get you're adding an interface for doing
backend.run()
via the circuit runner, but is that all that's needed? What about the other IQX api functionality? Also what about the in progress PRs like: Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-provider#365 ?
@renier - also unsure about the exact plan for this repo qiskit-ibm-provider
I get you're adding an interface for doing
backend.run()
via the circuit runner, but is that all that's needed?
For reference https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-runtime/issues/459
Putting on hold label back on. Like Matthew said we shouldn't deprecate this until there is a replacement.
Summary
fixes #1042
Details and comments