Open enavarro51 opened 2 years ago
Hi @enavarro51, Is this issue still relevant? I would like to help as much as I can.
Sure. Any of the functions in retworkx.src.connectivity.mod.rs
that are not already in
retworkx.retworkx-core.src.connectivity
could be moved in a way similar to the way connected_components
was done. Let me know if you have any questions about it.
Hey @enavarro51 I would like to work on this. I have read and also got the slightest idea of what needs to be done. Also, I'm unable to find the retworkx-core folder.
Hi @SUGARXUST thanks for reaching out. If you want you can have a look at my MR and help with testing and adding more stuff
Sure I would like to help @kris524 please mention the request so that I can see what's going on and what can be done by me.
What is the expected enhancement?
595 is in the process of moving
connected_components
andnumber_connected_components
fromretworkx/src/connectivity/conn_components.rs
toretworkx-core/src/connectivity/conn_components.rs
.There are a number of other connected component related functions in
retworkx/src/connectivity/mod.rs
, such asstrongly_connected_components
,is_connected
, andnode_connected_component
, that could also be moved over toretworkx-core/src/connectivity
. The function inmod.rs
would then just call theretworkx-core
version, similar to what's done withconnected_components
.