Closed warna720 closed 3 years ago
Would be nice to get your feedback also @tux2000
Sorry, I don't have a deep enough understanding of the codebase yet to give a qualified review.
In general I would expect using the "mobile" API over the "website" API should shield us a little against changes on the other end. And when adding new functions and files it might be informative to have a clue on their come about in the functionname/filename instead of adding a counter. Alternatively get_transactions
could be just replaced with the new code if the arguments and returns are compatible and the new code is considered superior...
get_transactions2
is not backward compatible since we dont have the same filters available.
get_transactions
does not return result with urlParameterId
, neither does any other endpoint from what I could find. And I cant find anywhere to get the note (avräkningsnota) in the app (Android) which could have pointed us in the direction where to get urlParameterId
from the mobile API.
So neither is superior, they just have different filters/data, hence get_transactions2
. Im open to more descriptive naming, alternatively merging them somehow if possible.
Maybe rename get_transactions2
to get_transactions_as_(desktop/web)
?
And then having get_transactions_as_mobile
return the result from get_transactions
?
I think it would be better to name it after what it does, rather than how it does it. So if it returns more info, maybe get_transaction_with_extended_info or something similar would be a better name?
Its not extended info, its a whole other endpoint with other filters. Some data is extended some data does not overlap e.g. totalNumberOfTransactions
in get_transactions
not included in get_transactions2
Maybe get_transactions_details
?
Changed it to get_transactions_details
Maybe let the naming marinate in our brains for the night atleast before we decide
Would be nice to get this merged & released today if possible, and we dont have any more change-requests :)
get_transactions()
does not return data withurlParameterId
which is the accountId encrypted by Avanza and also used as one part to fetch the note. Thereforeget_transactions2()
which returns data withurlParameterId
.and so we have the
get_note_as_binary_blob(url_parameter_id, note_id)
which returns the pdf as a binary blob.Would be nice to get feedback fast so we can merge this and hopefully get this released ASAP.