Open dojt opened 1 year ago
Good catch... but I'd say this is quite an edge case for evaluation of boxed array, could you elaborate on why this needs to be a Real
?
I think a simple fix could be to initialize them to zero since the actual value will be assigned later or not used anyways.
Right, I think using uninitialized memory here is fine, as the Vector{Float64}(undef, n)
is usually small (tho not guaranteed), and thus err1 >> err2
is always true. So we could change the initialization from similar
to zero
which will be a bit costly, but probably not a big deal at all.
This is why I ask what would be the use case for Real
or the above case since I think this is really an edge case, it'd be nice to make a decision if there is an actual use case effected by this.
Hey guys,
Is it possible that
vm[m+1]
may be read out without having been initialized in the following line?https://github.com/QuEraComputing/Bloqade.jl/blob/4c3b0be48a9840e6f5dd2abd307e44bc2c964717/lib/BloqadeKrylov/src/expmv.jl#L129
It seems to me that it could happen if the "happy breakdown" occurs for
j==m
in the 1st iteration of the while loop, no?