@minhthin1028 , now the mapping should be correct. Please check the example in the README.
The weights should be in range [0, 1]. This mapping preserves the degeneracy.
I am pretty sure the adiabatic time evolution with this mapping is very different from the previous one, because the weights in the previous mapping are limited to a very small range. Thanks for pointing out the degeneracy problem, now I understand better about Hannes's mapping scheme, this update is very important!
@minhthin1028 , now the mapping should be correct. Please check the example in the README.
The weights should be in range [0, 1]. This mapping preserves the degeneracy.
I am pretty sure the adiabatic time evolution with this mapping is very different from the previous one, because the weights in the previous mapping are limited to a very small range. Thanks for pointing out the degeneracy problem, now I understand better about Hannes's mapping scheme, this update is very important!