Closed smu160 closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 97.15%. Comparing base (
48a8d15
) to head (aaa6a89
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This PR should address issue #24.
TL;DR
There's a bug in the original implementation of reverse (i.e., inverse FFT). I've yet to figure out a direct fix. Nevertheless, one can compute the inverse FFT using the forward FFT [1].
Note this is meant to be a stop-gap solution until I get to the bottom of the underlying issue.
References
[1] [2]