Closed stephen-rowan closed 2 years ago
Thank you James Dunseith (@workshopmaybe) for your comment,
Yes, you have a point that a templated "comment" can come across as impersonal - what I was trying to achieve was impartiality. I also found that it was too wordy for some people.
I agree that building an open organization is a long and organic process. But also that process has to start somewhere from some kind of initiative that involves a risk, a leap in the dark.
Yes it does feel a little like an audit from a centralized authority doesn't it ? There must be a balance between formality and friendliness in surveys or assessments.
Hoop jumping documentation can be pain. But our Catalyst proposals will likely face this when dealing with bureaucracies. How should we prepare for this ?
I am trying to provide value and clearly it will be flawed like any initial attempt.
Yes the rhetoric of "Distributing Trust & facilitating co-operation" and "arbitrary authority" does have the feel of "playing to the gallery" - such is the consequence of compressing a philosophy into a word count.
Thank for alerting me to the broken link - which is now fixed : https://github.com/Quality-Assurance-DAO/DAO-Open-Source/blob/main/Documents/Tokens/01-Keep-It-Simple.md
Yes certainly more information should be provided and you have helped me greatly in identifying what that might be.
These comments have been captured as Issue https://github.com/Quality-Assurance-DAO/F5-Developer-ecosystem-Proposal/issues/80 .