[x] - A. Received emails from communications@iohk.io
B
[x] - B. Submitted this proposal to only one challenge.
I have articulated in my proposal ...
C
[x] - C. How my proposal impacts the challenge metrics.
How my proposal impacts the challenge metrics is articulated in the comments beneath each box checked below.
The challenge metrics in F5: Developer ecosystem are -
[x] - At the end of this challenge, we will be asking ourselves: Did we manage to make it easier for developers to build on top of Cardano?
I hope to highlight this in Output (3) Open-Source Assessment Report that an improved awareness of the wide range of the open-source Cardano community may enable developers to build from many different even contrary directions.
[x] - Filling in gaps defined in the exploration stage.
[x] - Number of developers actively building on top of Cardano
[x] - Number of repos on Github using the tooling. (Month over month increase)
The tooling in this proposal, the repo, is the proposal undone. It will offer a deconstructed, dissected and resurrected F5-Developer-ecosystem-Proposal. Although not usable as a template - it is hoped it's bones may be picked over for many months to come as point of reference.
[x] - Reduce wait time of unanswered communications with developers to 24 hours.
[x] -A sense of community and conversations. Having people around to talk with.
This proposal has already been circulated around the Catalyst open-source community, provoking mixed reactions and conversations.
D
[x] - D. How I address the challenge question.
I addressed the challenge question "How can we create a positive developer experience that helps the developer focus on building successful apps?" by focusing on one instance of a development lifecycle ; how to take something broken to the community to fix.
E
[x] - E. Definition of Success after 3, 6 and 12 months.
Definitions of Success :
3 Months - The Proposal is funded, it's contribution is recognized, which provided an incentive to continue to Fund 7.
6 Months - The Proposal is used as a useful reference tool for other proposals.
12 Months - The Proposal is now redundant and regarded as a historical anomaly.
F
[x] - F. Broken down my Budget Requirements.
My Budget is broken into $5 for basic costs. The minting of an ADA Non-Fungible Token is pending negotiation for work in kind with NFT-DAO.
G
[x] - G. Include identifying information about all proposers.
The Self-Assessment Checklist
My (The Proposers) Completion :
I confirm that I have ...
A
B
I have articulated in my proposal ...
C
How my proposal impacts the challenge metrics is articulated in the comments beneath each box checked below.
The challenge metrics in F5: Developer ecosystem are -
I hope to highlight this in Output (3) Open-Source Assessment Report that an improved awareness of the wide range of the open-source Cardano community may enable developers to build from many different even contrary directions.
[x] - Filling in gaps defined in the exploration stage.
[x] - Number of developers actively building on top of Cardano
[x] - Number of repos on Github using the tooling. (Month over month increase)
The tooling in this proposal, the repo, is the proposal undone. It will offer a deconstructed, dissected and resurrected F5-Developer-ecosystem-Proposal. Although not usable as a template - it is hoped it's bones may be picked over for many months to come as point of reference.
[x] - Reduce wait time of unanswered communications with developers to 24 hours.
[x] -A sense of community and conversations. Having people around to talk with.
This proposal has already been circulated around the Catalyst open-source community, provoking mixed reactions and conversations.
D
I addressed the challenge question "How can we create a positive developer experience that helps the developer focus on building successful apps?" by focusing on one instance of a development lifecycle ; how to take something broken to the community to fix.
E
Definitions of Success :
3 Months - The Proposal is funded, it's contribution is recognized, which provided an incentive to continue to Fund 7.
6 Months - The Proposal is used as a useful reference tool for other proposals.
12 Months - The Proposal is now redundant and regarded as a historical anomaly.
F
My Budget is broken into $5 for basic costs. The minting of an ADA Non-Fungible Token is pending negotiation for work in kind with NFT-DAO.
G
The repository maintainer Stephen Whitenstall https://stephen-rowan.github.io/
H
11/04/2021 (Alpha Version 0.0 - Released) through 26/05/2021 (Release of Alpha Version 2.0) to Governance : Due : TBA (by Project Catalyst).
QA Issues :
General Usability :
QA of each question :
I confirm that I have ... (QA)
This question seems to have generated the greatest confusion. Which emails ? When ? From whom ? For what purpose ?
I have articulated in my proposal ...
What metrics ? Where can they be found ?
A more specific reference to the challenge question might be helpful
Quite Clear
Quite Clear
Quite Clear. Although define "identifying information" ?
Quite Clear